Object 1
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, accepted July 2026
Politecnico di Milano
Contact: giuseppefabio.preziosa@polimi.it
Method
Experimental validation
Results
Additional material
Concave objects and mutual reflections are challenging because changing the angle of incidence may not always be sufficient to recover missing depth measurements. We performed an additional qualitative evaluation on four objects characterized by reflective surfaces, concave regions, or both. CAD models were not available for these objects, so the comparison is qualitative. Overall, FRA-NBV remains less affected by concave and reflective regions than the PB-NBV baseline.
For questions about the paper or additional material, contact giuseppefabio.preziosa@polimi.it.
Reference
@article{franbv2026,
title = {FRA-NBV: A Fast and Reflectivity-Aware Next-Best-View Strategy},
author = {TODO},
journal = {IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters},
year = {2026},
doi = {TODO}
}